Demographics details for Cedarbluff, MS vs Roaring spring, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedarbluff, MS vs Roaring spring, PA.

Data Cedarbluff Roaring spring
Population 170 2,333
Median Age 42.0 years 36.1 years
Median Income $60,000 $63,194
Married Families 50.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 15% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 5.0

Population Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Roaring spring

  • The population in Roaring spring is higher at 2,333, compared to 170 in Cedarbluff.
  • Residents in Cedarbluff have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 36.1 years in Roaring spring.
  • Roaring spring has a higher median income of $63,194, compared to $60,000 in Cedarbluff.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedarbluff at 50.0% compared to 43.0% in Roaring spring.
  • Cedarbluff has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Roaring spring.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Cedarbluff and Roaring spring at 5.0%.

Demographics

Demographics Cedarbluff vs Roaring spring provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedarbluff Roaring spring
Black 25 1
White 70 91
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 3
Two or More Races 2 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Roaring spring

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedarbluff at 25% compared to 1% in Roaring spring.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Roaring spring at 91% compared to 70% in Cedarbluff.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cedarbluff at 1% compared to 0% in Roaring spring.
  • Roaring spring has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Roaring spring at 5%, compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedarbluff and Roaring spring at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedarbluff Roaring spring
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 18.2%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 12.2%
Depression Data is updating% 25.5%
Smoking Data is updating% 21.4%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 18.5%
Obesity Data is updating% 34.7%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Roaring spring

  • In Roaring spring, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Roaring spring at 25.5% versus 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Roaring spring has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Roaring spring at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Roaring spring has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Roaring spring at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedarbluff Roaring spring
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (9)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 25.9% (605)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.2% (168)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 13.5% (316)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Roaring spring

  • In Roaring spring, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • In Roaring spring, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Roaring spring at 7.2%, compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • In Roaring spring, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.