Environment details: Cedarbluff MS
Water quality poor due to historical contamination.
Environment details: Fitzgerald GA
Average; continued monitoring is important.
Compare Environment: Cedarbluff MS vs Fitzgerald GA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Cedarbluff | Fitzgerald |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 504 | 993 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Water quality poor due to historical contamination. | Average; continued monitoring is important. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.58 | 1.58 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 27 | 26 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Fitzgerald
- The water quality in Fitzgerald is superior at 5/10 compared to 3/10 in Cedarbluff.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Both cities have the same average air quality index of 1.58.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Cedarbluff at 27 compared to 26 in Fitzgerald.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.