Demographics details for Cedarbluff, MS vs Federal way, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedarbluff, MS vs Federal way, WA.

Data Cedarbluff Federal way
Population 170 97,863
Median Age 42.0 years 37.4 years
Median Income $60,000 $80,360
Married Families 50.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 15% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 5.7

Population Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Federal way

  • The population in Federal way is higher at 97,863, compared to 170 in Cedarbluff.
  • Residents in Cedarbluff have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 37.4 years in Federal way.
  • Federal way has a higher median income of $80,360, compared to $60,000 in Cedarbluff.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedarbluff at 50.0% compared to 39.0% in Federal way.
  • Cedarbluff has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Federal way.
  • Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 5.0% in Cedarbluff.

Demographics

Demographics Cedarbluff vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedarbluff Federal way
Black 25 17
White 70 34
Asian 1 15
Hispanic 2 19
Two or More Races 2 14
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Federal way

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedarbluff at 25% compared to 17% in Federal way.
  • Cedarbluff has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 34% in Federal way.
  • In Federal way, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 1% in Cedarbluff.
  • Federal way has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
  • In Federal way, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cedarbluff.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedarbluff Federal way
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.9%
Depression Data is updating% 24.7%
Smoking Data is updating% 12.7%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.5%
Obesity Data is updating% 27.2%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Federal way

  • In Federal way, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Federal way at 24.7% versus 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Federal way has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Federal way at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Federal way has higher obesity rates at 27.2% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Federal way at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedarbluff Federal way
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.8% (1,735)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 15.3% (15,003)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.0% (10,805)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 21.2% (20,761)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Federal way

  • In Federal way, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • In Federal way, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Federal way at 11.0%, compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • In Federal way, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.