Demographics details for Cedarbluff, MS vs Fairfield, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedarbluff, MS vs Fairfield, CA.

Data Cedarbluff Fairfield
Population 170 119,338
Median Age 42.0 years 35.8 years
Median Income $60,000 $98,857
Married Families 50.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 15% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 5.1

Population Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Fairfield

  • The population in Fairfield is higher at 119,338, compared to 170 in Cedarbluff.
  • Residents in Cedarbluff have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
  • Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857, compared to $60,000 in Cedarbluff.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedarbluff at 50.0% compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
  • Cedarbluff has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Fairfield.
  • Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 5.0% in Cedarbluff.

Demographics

Demographics Cedarbluff vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedarbluff Fairfield
Black 25 15
White 70 23
Asian 1 18
Hispanic 2 30
Two or More Races 2 14
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Fairfield

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedarbluff at 25% compared to 15% in Fairfield.
  • Cedarbluff has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
  • In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 1% in Cedarbluff.
  • Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairfield at 14%, compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedarbluff and Fairfield at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedarbluff Fairfield
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.7%
Depression Data is updating% 17.7%
Smoking Data is updating% 11.9%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.1%
Obesity Data is updating% 30.1%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Fairfield

  • In Fairfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fairfield at 17.7% versus 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Fairfield has a higher smoking rate at 11.9% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairfield at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 30.1% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedarbluff Fairfield
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.1% (2,515)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 13.7% (16,358)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 14.6% (17,464)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 18.3% (21,856)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Fairfield

  • In Fairfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • In Fairfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairfield at 14.6%, compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
  • In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.