Demographics details for Cedar rapids, IA vs Winslow, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar rapids, IA vs Winslow, AR.
Data | Cedar rapids | Winslow |
---|---|---|
Population | 136,429 | 362 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 40.8 years |
Median Income | $66,895 | $43,036 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Winslow
- In Cedar rapids, the population is higher at 136,429, compared to 362 in Winslow.
- The median age in Winslow is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 37.0 years in Cedar rapids.
- Cedar rapids has a higher median income of $66,895 compared to $43,036 in Winslow.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar rapids at 37.0% compared to 32.0% in Winslow.
- The poverty level is higher in Winslow at 15%, compared to 10% in Cedar rapids.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar rapids is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.5% in Winslow.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar rapids vs Winslow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cedar rapids | Winslow |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | Data is updating |
White | 78 | 87 |
Asian | 3 | 6 |
Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Winslow
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar rapids at 9% compared to 0% in Winslow.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Winslow at 87% compared to 78% in Cedar rapids.
- In Winslow, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 3% in Cedar rapids.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar rapids at 4% compared to 1% in Winslow.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar rapids at 6% compared to 4% in Winslow.
- In Winslow, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Cedar rapids.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cedar rapids | Winslow |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 12.5% |
Depression | 21.3% | 26.2% |
Smoking | 16.9% | 19.8% |
Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 39.4% | 32.3% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Winslow
- In Winslow, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.5% in Cedar rapids.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Winslow at 26.2% versus 21.3% in Cedar rapids.
- Winslow has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 16.9% in Cedar rapids.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar rapids at 22.1% compared to 16.5% in Winslow.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar rapids at 39.4% compared to 32.3% in Winslow.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Winslow at 22.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar rapids.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cedar rapids | Winslow |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (803) | 0.3% (1) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (20,356) | 23.2% (84) |
Less than High School | 6.9% (9,473) | 18.2% (66) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (30,460) | 9.9% (36) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Winslow
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar rapids have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Winslow.
- In Winslow, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.2% compared to 14.9% in Cedar rapids.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Winslow at 18.2%, compared to 6.9% in Cedar rapids.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 9.9% in Winslow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.