Demographics details for Cedar rapids, IA vs Two rivers, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedar rapids, IA vs Two rivers, WI.

Data Cedar rapids Two rivers
Population 136,429 11,166
Median Age 37.0 years 44.7 years
Median Income $66,895 $56,236
Married Families 37.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 10% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 3.1

Population Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Two rivers

  • In Cedar rapids, the population is higher at 136,429, compared to 11,166 in Two rivers.
  • The median age in Two rivers is higher at 44.7 years, compared to 37.0 years in Cedar rapids.
  • Cedar rapids has a higher median income of $66,895 compared to $56,236 in Two rivers.
  • In Two rivers, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 37.0% in Cedar rapids.
  • The poverty level is higher in Two rivers at 11%, compared to 10% in Cedar rapids.
  • The unemployment rate in Cedar rapids is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.1% in Two rivers.

Demographics

Demographics Cedar rapids vs Two rivers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedar rapids Two rivers
Black 9 2
White 78 86
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 4 6
Two or More Races 6 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Two rivers

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar rapids at 9% compared to 2% in Two rivers.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Two rivers at 86% compared to 78% in Cedar rapids.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cedar rapids at 3% compared to 1% in Two rivers.
  • Two rivers has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Cedar rapids.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar rapids at 6% compared to 5% in Two rivers.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar rapids and Two rivers at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedar rapids Two rivers
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 10.8%
Depression 21.3% 24.3%
Smoking 16.9% 18.0%
Binge Drinking 22.1% 23.7%
Obesity 39.4% 36.7%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Two rivers

  • In Two rivers, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.5% in Cedar rapids.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Two rivers at 24.3% versus 21.3% in Cedar rapids.
  • Two rivers has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 16.9% in Cedar rapids.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Two rivers at 23.7% compared to 22.1% in Cedar rapids.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cedar rapids at 39.4% compared to 36.7% in Two rivers.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Two rivers at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar rapids.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedar rapids Two rivers
No Schooling 0.6% (803) 0.7% (83)
High School Diploma 14.9% (20,356) 24.6% (2,745)
Less than High School 6.9% (9,473) 8.7% (974)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (30,460) 17.1% (1,912)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Two rivers

  • In Two rivers, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Cedar rapids.
  • In Two rivers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 14.9% in Cedar rapids.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Two rivers at 8.7%, compared to 6.9% in Cedar rapids.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cedar rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 17.1% in Two rivers.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.