Demographics details for Cedar rapids, IA vs Essex junction, VT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedar rapids, IA vs Essex junction, VT.

Data Cedar rapids Essex junction
Population 136,429 10,917
Median Age 37.0 years 39.9 years
Median Income $66,895 $92,589
Married Families 37.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 10% 6%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 2.5

Population Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Essex junction

  • In Cedar rapids, the population is higher at 136,429, compared to 10,917 in Essex junction.
  • The median age in Essex junction is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 37.0 years in Cedar rapids.
  • Essex junction has a higher median income of $92,589, compared to $66,895 in Cedar rapids.
  • In Essex junction, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 37.0% in Cedar rapids.
  • Cedar rapids has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Essex junction.
  • The unemployment rate in Cedar rapids is higher at 4.3%, compared to 2.5% in Essex junction.

Demographics

Demographics Cedar rapids vs Essex junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedar rapids Essex junction
Black 9 3
White 78 79
Asian 3 8
Hispanic 4 2
Two or More Races 6 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Essex junction

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar rapids at 9% compared to 3% in Essex junction.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Essex junction at 79% compared to 78% in Cedar rapids.
  • In Essex junction, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 3% in Cedar rapids.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar rapids at 4% compared to 2% in Essex junction.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Essex junction at 8%, compared to 6% in Cedar rapids.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar rapids and Essex junction at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedar rapids Essex junction
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 8.1%
Depression 21.3% 27.1%
Smoking 16.9% 11.8%
Binge Drinking 22.1% 20.9%
Obesity 39.4% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Essex junction

  • More residents in Cedar rapids report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 15.1% in Essex junction.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Essex junction at 27.1% versus 21.3% in Cedar rapids.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar rapids at 16.9% compared to 11.8% in Essex junction.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cedar rapids at 22.1% compared to 20.9% in Essex junction.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cedar rapids at 39.4% compared to 26.4% in Essex junction.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Essex junction at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar rapids.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedar rapids Essex junction
No Schooling 0.6% (803) 1.5% (162)
High School Diploma 14.9% (20,356) 8.2% (899)
Less than High School 6.9% (9,473) 8.8% (966)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (30,460) 34.3% (3,742)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Essex junction

  • In Essex junction, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.6% in Cedar rapids.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cedar rapids hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 8.2% in Essex junction.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Essex junction at 8.8%, compared to 6.9% in Cedar rapids.
  • In Essex junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.3% compared to 22.3% in Cedar rapids.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.