Demographics details for Cedar rapids, IA vs Dacula, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar rapids, IA vs Dacula, GA.
Data | Cedar rapids | Dacula |
---|---|---|
Population | 136,429 | 7,460 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 35.0 years |
Median Income | $66,895 | $81,322 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Dacula
- In Cedar rapids, the population is higher at 136,429, compared to 7,460 in Dacula.
- Residents in Cedar rapids have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 35.0 years in Dacula.
- Dacula has a higher median income of $81,322, compared to $66,895 in Cedar rapids.
- In Dacula, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Cedar rapids.
- Cedar rapids has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Dacula.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar rapids is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.2% in Dacula.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar rapids vs Dacula provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cedar rapids | Dacula |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 23 |
White | 78 | 41 |
Asian | 3 | 7 |
Hispanic | 4 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Dacula
- In Dacula, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 9% in Cedar rapids.
- Cedar rapids has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 41% in Dacula.
- In Dacula, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Cedar rapids.
- Dacula has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 4% in Cedar rapids.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dacula at 9%, compared to 6% in Cedar rapids.
- In Dacula, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cedar rapids.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cedar rapids | Dacula |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 9.5% |
Depression | 21.3% | 19.1% |
Smoking | 16.9% | 12.9% |
Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 39.4% | 29.7% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Dacula
- More residents in Cedar rapids report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.4% in Dacula.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar rapids at 21.3% compared to 19.1% in Dacula.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar rapids at 16.9% compared to 12.9% in Dacula.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar rapids at 22.1% compared to 16.5% in Dacula.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar rapids at 39.4% compared to 29.7% in Dacula.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Dacula at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar rapids.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cedar rapids | Dacula |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (803) | 4.8% (355) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (20,356) | 8.0% (599) |
Less than High School | 6.9% (9,473) | 17.0% (1,267) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (30,460) | 13.2% (988) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Dacula
- In Dacula, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.8% compared to 0.6% in Cedar rapids.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar rapids hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 8.0% in Dacula.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dacula at 17.0%, compared to 6.9% in Cedar rapids.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 13.2% in Dacula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.