Demographics details for Cedar park, TX vs Richland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar park, TX vs Richland, MS.
| Data | Cedar park | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,642 | 7,297 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $118,903 | $54,753 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cedar park vs Richland
- In Cedar park, the population is higher at 77,642, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
- Residents in Cedar park have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 37.1 years in Richland.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903 compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar park at 45.0% compared to 40.0% in Richland.
- The poverty level is higher in Richland at 12%, compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- Richland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar park vs Richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar park | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 19 |
| White | 55 | 74 |
| Asian | 12 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar park vs Richland
- In Richland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 3% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Richland at 74% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar park at 12% compared to 2% in Richland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar park at 20% compared to 3% in Richland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar park at 10% compared to 2% in Richland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar park and Richland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar park | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar park vs Richland
- In Richland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar park at 24.1% compared to 23.4% in Richland.
- Richland has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Richland has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richland at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar park | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (287) | 1.7% (122) |
| High School Diploma | 8.9% (6,896) | 12.6% (916) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (3,156) | 10.0% (732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.8% (27,785) | 16.1% (1,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar park vs Richland
- In Richland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Cedar park.
- In Richland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richland at 10.0%, compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 16.1% in Richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.