Demographics details for Cedar park, TX vs Marshall, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar park, TX vs Marshall, AR.
| Data | Cedar park | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,642 | 1,339 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 52.3 years |
| Median Income | $118,903 | $28,290 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cedar park vs Marshall
- In Cedar park, the population is higher at 77,642, compared to 1,339 in Marshall.
- The median age in Marshall is higher at 52.3 years, compared to 37.6 years in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903 compared to $28,290 in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar park at 45.0% compared to 33.0% in Marshall.
- The poverty level is higher in Marshall at 16%, compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- Marshall has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar park vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar park | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 55 | 84 |
| Asian | 12 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar park vs Marshall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar park at 3% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Marshall at 84% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar park at 12% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar park at 20% compared to 3% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Marshall at 12%, compared to 10% in Cedar park.
- In Marshall, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cedar park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar park | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 21.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 16.2% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 29.8% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 27.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar park vs Marshall
- In Marshall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Marshall at 29.8% versus 24.1% in Cedar park.
- Marshall has a higher smoking rate at 27.2% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 14.7% in Marshall.
- Marshall has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Marshall at 30.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar park | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (287) | 0.9% (12) |
| High School Diploma | 8.9% (6,896) | 27.9% (373) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (3,156) | 32.4% (434) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.8% (27,785) | 11.7% (156) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar park vs Marshall
- In Marshall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Cedar park.
- In Marshall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Marshall at 32.4%, compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 11.7% in Marshall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.