Demographics details for Cedar park, TX vs Lodge, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar park, TX vs Lodge, SC.
Data | Cedar park | Lodge |
---|---|---|
Population | 77,642 | 84 |
Median Age | 37.6 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $118,903 | $34,938 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Cedar park vs Lodge
- In Cedar park, the population is higher at 77,642, compared to 84 in Lodge.
- The median age in Lodge is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 37.6 years in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903 compared to $34,938 in Lodge.
- In Lodge, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 45.0% in Cedar park.
- The poverty level is higher in Lodge at 15%, compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- Lodge has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar park vs Lodge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cedar park | Lodge |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 5 |
White | 55 | 34 |
Asian | 12 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 20 | 61 |
Two or More Races | 10 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar park vs Lodge
- In Lodge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 34% in Lodge.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar park at 12% compared to 0% in Lodge.
- Lodge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 61%, compared to 20% in Cedar park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar park at 10% compared to 0% in Lodge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar park and Lodge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cedar park | Lodge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 15.6% |
Depression | 24.1% | 22.4% |
Smoking | 11.0% | 22.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 31.0% | 34.9% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 45.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar park vs Lodge
- In Lodge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar park at 24.1% compared to 22.4% in Lodge.
- Lodge has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 16.0% in Lodge.
- Lodge has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lodge at 45.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cedar park | Lodge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (287) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 8.9% (6,896) | 60.7% (51) |
Less than High School | 4.1% (3,156) | 26.2% (22) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.8% (27,785) | 8.3% (7) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar park vs Lodge
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar park have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Lodge.
- In Lodge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 60.7% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lodge at 26.2%, compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 8.3% in Lodge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.