Demographics details for Cedar park, TX vs Hornick, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar park, TX vs Hornick, IA.
| Data | Cedar park | Hornick |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,642 | 253 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 32.8 years |
| Median Income | $118,903 | $78,750 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Cedar park vs Hornick
- In Cedar park, the population is higher at 77,642, compared to 253 in Hornick.
- Residents in Cedar park have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 32.8 years in Hornick.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903 compared to $78,750 in Hornick.
- In Hornick, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 45.0% in Cedar park.
- The poverty level is identical in both Cedar park and Hornick at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar park is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.0% in Hornick.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar park vs Hornick provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar park | Hornick |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 55 | 96 |
| Asian | 12 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar park vs Hornick
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar park at 3% compared to 0% in Hornick.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hornick at 96% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar park at 12% compared to 0% in Hornick.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar park at 20% compared to 1% in Hornick.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar park at 10% compared to 3% in Hornick.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar park and Hornick at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar park | Hornick |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 15.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 23.2% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar park vs Hornick
- In Hornick, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar park at 24.1% compared to 20.4% in Hornick.
- Hornick has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hornick at 23.2% compared to 17.9% in Cedar park.
- Hornick has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cedar park at 8.0% compared to 4.0% in Hornick.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar park | Hornick |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (287) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 8.9% (6,896) | 24.9% (63) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (3,156) | 11.9% (30) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.8% (27,785) | 4.7% (12) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar park vs Hornick
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar park have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Hornick.
- In Hornick, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hornick at 11.9%, compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 4.7% in Hornick.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.