Demographics details for Cedar park, TX vs Bothell, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar park, TX vs Bothell, WA.
| Data | Cedar park | Bothell |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,642 | 49,017 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $118,903 | $127,944 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Cedar park vs Bothell
- In Cedar park, the population is higher at 77,642, compared to 49,017 in Bothell.
- The median age in Bothell is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 37.6 years in Cedar park.
- Bothell has a higher median income of $127,944, compared to $118,903 in Cedar park.
- In Bothell, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 45.0% in Cedar park.
- The poverty level is higher in Bothell at 6%, compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- Bothell has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar park vs Bothell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar park | Bothell |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 55 | 63 |
| Asian | 12 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar park vs Bothell
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar park at 3% compared to 1% in Bothell.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bothell at 63% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
- In Bothell, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 12% in Cedar park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar park at 20% compared to 9% in Bothell.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar park at 10% compared to 9% in Bothell.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar park and Bothell at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar park | Bothell |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 8.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 26.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar park vs Bothell
- In Bothell, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bothell at 25.7% versus 24.1% in Cedar park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar park at 11.0% compared to 8.9% in Bothell.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 17.5% in Bothell.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar park at 31.0% compared to 26.2% in Bothell.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bothell at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar park | Bothell |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (287) | 0.6% (276) |
| High School Diploma | 8.9% (6,896) | 6.4% (3,131) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (3,156) | 5.8% (2,838) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.8% (27,785) | 39.0% (19,107) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar park vs Bothell
- In Bothell, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar park hold a high school diploma at 8.9% compared to 6.4% in Bothell.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bothell at 5.8%, compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- In Bothell, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.0% compared to 35.8% in Cedar park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.