Demographics details for Cedar park, TX vs Billings, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar park, TX vs Billings, MT.
| Data | Cedar park | Billings |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,642 | 119,960 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 37.7 years |
| Median Income | $118,903 | $69,692 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cedar park vs Billings
- The population in Billings is higher at 119,960, compared to 77,642 in Cedar park.
- The median age in Billings is higher at 37.7 years, compared to 37.6 years in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903 compared to $69,692 in Billings.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar park at 45.0% compared to 37.0% in Billings.
- The poverty level is higher in Billings at 10%, compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar park is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Billings.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar park vs Billings provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar park | Billings |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 55 | 82 |
| Asian | 12 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar park vs Billings
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar park at 3% compared to 1% in Billings.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Billings at 82% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar park at 12% compared to 1% in Billings.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar park at 20% compared to 7% in Billings.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar park at 10% compared to 5% in Billings.
- In Billings, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Cedar park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar park | Billings |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 22.9% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar park vs Billings
- In Billings, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Billings at 27.8% versus 24.1% in Cedar park.
- Billings has a higher smoking rate at 16.1% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Billings at 22.9% compared to 17.9% in Cedar park.
- Billings has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Billings at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar park | Billings |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (287) | 0.3% (321) |
| High School Diploma | 8.9% (6,896) | 14.7% (17,691) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (3,156) | 5.4% (6,502) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.8% (27,785) | 24.8% (29,705) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar park vs Billings
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar park have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Billings.
- In Billings, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.7% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Billings at 5.4%, compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 24.8% in Billings.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.