Demographics details for Cedar lake, IN vs Spring valley, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedar lake, IN vs Spring valley, IL.

Data Cedar lake Spring valley
Population 15,592 5,461
Median Age 39.5 years 43.4 years
Median Income $84,444 $60,861
Married Families 40.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 5% 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Cedar lake vs Spring valley

  • In Cedar lake, the population is higher at 15,592, compared to 5,461 in Spring valley.
  • The median age in Spring valley is higher at 43.4 years, compared to 39.5 years in Cedar lake.
  • Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444 compared to $60,861 in Spring valley.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Cedar lake and Spring valley at 40.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Spring valley at 14%, compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
  • Spring valley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.

Demographics

Demographics Cedar lake vs Spring valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedar lake Spring valley
Black Data is updating 2
White 94 72
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 23
Two or More Races 3 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Spring valley

  • In Spring valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
  • Cedar lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 72% in Spring valley.
  • Both Cedar lake and Spring valley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Spring valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
  • Both Cedar lake and Spring valley have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar lake and Spring valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedar lake Spring valley
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 11.5%
Depression 25.4% 22.1%
Smoking 18.8% 17.9%
Binge Drinking 19.8% 17.7%
Obesity 37.2% 37.6%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Spring valley

  • Poor mental health levels are equal in both Cedar lake and Spring valley at 16.6%.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cedar lake at 25.4% compared to 22.1% in Spring valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar lake at 18.8% compared to 17.9% in Spring valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 17.7% in Spring valley.
  • Spring valley has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 37.2% in Cedar lake.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spring valley at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedar lake Spring valley
No Schooling 0.4% (67) 1.6% (85)
High School Diploma 21.1% (3,292) 20.0% (1,092)
Less than High School 7.1% (1,102) 17.8% (970)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.1% (2,204) 12.3% (669)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedar lake vs Spring valley

  • In Spring valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Cedar lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 20.0% in Spring valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spring valley at 17.8%, compared to 7.1% in Cedar lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 12.3% in Spring valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.