Demographics details for Cedar lake, IN vs Sanford, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar lake, IN vs Sanford, NC.
| Data | Cedar lake | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,592 | 31,224 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $84,444 | $52,951 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Cedar lake vs Sanford
- The population in Sanford is higher at 31,224, compared to 15,592 in Cedar lake.
- Residents in Cedar lake have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 34.6 years in Sanford.
- Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444 compared to $52,951 in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar lake at 40.0% compared to 32.0% in Sanford.
- The poverty level is higher in Sanford at 13%, compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
- Sanford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar lake vs Sanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar lake | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 25 |
| White | 94 | 34 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Sanford
- In Sanford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- Cedar lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 34% in Sanford.
- In Sanford, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cedar lake.
- Sanford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sanford at 10%, compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar lake and Sanford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar lake | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Sanford
- In Sanford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.6% in Cedar lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar lake at 25.4% compared to 23.2% in Sanford.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Cedar lake and Sanford at 18.8%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 15.3% in Sanford.
- Sanford has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 37.2% in Cedar lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sanford at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar lake | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (67) | 1.4% (443) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (3,292) | 12.5% (3,909) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (1,102) | 22.6% (7,052) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (2,204) | 12.9% (4,025) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar lake vs Sanford
- In Sanford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.4% in Cedar lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 12.5% in Sanford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sanford at 22.6%, compared to 7.1% in Cedar lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 12.9% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.