Demographics details for Cedar lake, IN vs Randleman, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar lake, IN vs Randleman, NC.
Data | Cedar lake | Randleman |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,592 | 4,642 |
Median Age | 39.5 years | 33.5 years |
Median Income | $84,444 | $63,040 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cedar lake vs Randleman
- In Cedar lake, the population is higher at 15,592, compared to 4,642 in Randleman.
- Residents in Cedar lake have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 33.5 years in Randleman.
- Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444 compared to $63,040 in Randleman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar lake at 40.0% compared to 38.0% in Randleman.
- The poverty level is higher in Randleman at 10%, compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Cedar lake and Randleman at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar lake vs Randleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cedar lake | Randleman |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 4 |
White | 94 | 77 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Randleman
- In Randleman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- Cedar lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 77% in Randleman.
- Both Cedar lake and Randleman have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Randleman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Randleman at 8%, compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- In Randleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cedar lake | Randleman |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 12.0% |
Depression | 25.4% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 18.8% | 19.4% |
Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 37.5% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Randleman
- In Randleman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.6% in Cedar lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Randleman at 25.7% versus 25.4% in Cedar lake.
- Randleman has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 18.8% in Cedar lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 17.7% in Randleman.
- Randleman has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 37.2% in Cedar lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Randleman at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cedar lake | Randleman |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (67) | 0.3% (16) |
High School Diploma | 21.1% (3,292) | 16.5% (768) |
Less than High School | 7.1% (1,102) | 22.1% (1,026) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (2,204) | 6.9% (320) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar lake vs Randleman
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Randleman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 16.5% in Randleman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Randleman at 22.1%, compared to 7.1% in Cedar lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 6.9% in Randleman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.