Demographics details for Cedar lake, IN vs Maple valley, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedar lake, IN vs Maple valley, WA.

Data Cedar lake Maple valley
Population 15,592 28,220
Median Age 39.5 years 36.4 years
Median Income $84,444 $137,595
Married Families 40.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Cedar lake vs Maple valley

  • The population in Maple valley is higher at 28,220, compared to 15,592 in Cedar lake.
  • Residents in Cedar lake have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 36.4 years in Maple valley.
  • Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595, compared to $84,444 in Cedar lake.
  • In Maple valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 40.0% in Cedar lake.
  • Cedar lake has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
  • Maple valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.

Demographics

Demographics Cedar lake vs Maple valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedar lake Maple valley
Black Data is updating 2
White 94 74
Asian Data is updating 11
Hispanic 3 5
Two or More Races 3 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Maple valley

  • In Maple valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
  • Cedar lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 74% in Maple valley.
  • In Maple valley, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Cedar lake.
  • Maple valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Maple valley at 8%, compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar lake and Maple valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedar lake Maple valley
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 15.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 8.6%
Depression 25.4% 25.8%
Smoking 18.8% 9.4%
Binge Drinking 19.8% 19.6%
Obesity 37.2% 24.3%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Maple valley

  • More residents in Cedar lake report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.9% in Maple valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Maple valley at 25.8% versus 25.4% in Cedar lake.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar lake at 18.8% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 19.6% in Maple valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cedar lake at 37.2% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cedar lake at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedar lake Maple valley
No Schooling 0.4% (67) 0.4% (103)
High School Diploma 21.1% (3,292) 10.2% (2,878)
Less than High School 7.1% (1,102) 3.1% (879)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.1% (2,204) 28.5% (8,032)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedar lake vs Maple valley

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cedar lake and Maple valley at 0.4%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 10.2% in Maple valley.
  • More residents in Cedar lake have less than a high school education at 7.1% compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
  • In Maple valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 14.1% in Cedar lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.