Demographics details for Cedar lake, IN vs Fairfield, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar lake, IN vs Fairfield, CT.
Data | Cedar lake | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,592 | 62,105 |
Median Age | 39.5 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $84,444 | $102,000 |
Married Families | 40.0% | Data is updating |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Cedar lake vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 62,105, compared to 15,592 in Cedar lake.
- The median age in Fairfield is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 39.5 years in Cedar lake.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $102,000, compared to $84,444 in Cedar lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar lake at 40.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is identical in both Cedar lake and Fairfield at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar lake is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.9% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar lake vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cedar lake | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 5 |
White | 94 | 80 |
Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- Cedar lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 80% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Cedar lake.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar lake at 3% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar lake and Fairfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cedar lake | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 25.4% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 18.8% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 19.8% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 37.2% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Fairfield
- More residents in Cedar lake report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar lake at 25.4% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar lake at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar lake at 37.2% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cedar lake at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cedar lake | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (67) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 21.1% (3,292) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 7.1% (1,102) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (2,204) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar lake vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Cedar lake have less than a high school education at 7.1% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.