Demographics details for Cedar lake, IN vs Chalfont, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar lake, IN vs Chalfont, PA.
| Data | Cedar lake | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,592 | 4,283 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $84,444 | $118,871 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Cedar lake vs Chalfont
- In Cedar lake, the population is higher at 15,592, compared to 4,283 in Chalfont.
- The median age in Chalfont is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 39.5 years in Cedar lake.
- Chalfont has a higher median income of $118,871, compared to $84,444 in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Cedar lake and Chalfont at 40.0%.
- Cedar lake has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 2% in Chalfont.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar lake is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Chalfont.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar lake vs Chalfont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar lake | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 94 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Chalfont
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cedar lake and Chalfont at 0%.
- Cedar lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 88% in Chalfont.
- In Chalfont, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Cedar lake.
- Chalfont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chalfont at 4%, compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar lake and Chalfont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar lake | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 7.8% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 12.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 20.5% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Chalfont
- More residents in Cedar lake report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 13.8% in Chalfont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar lake at 25.4% compared to 22.1% in Chalfont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar lake at 18.8% compared to 12.6% in Chalfont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chalfont at 20.5% compared to 19.8% in Cedar lake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar lake at 37.2% compared to 29.5% in Chalfont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cedar lake at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Chalfont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar lake | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (67) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (3,292) | 11.2% (479) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (1,102) | 2.3% (98) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (2,204) | 42.7% (1,830) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar lake vs Chalfont
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Chalfont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 11.2% in Chalfont.
- More residents in Cedar lake have less than a high school education at 7.1% compared to 2.3% in Chalfont.
- In Chalfont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 14.1% in Cedar lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.