Demographics details for Cedar lake, IN vs Arvada, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar lake, IN vs Arvada, CO.
| Data | Cedar lake | Arvada |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,592 | 121,581 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 40.2 years |
| Median Income | $84,444 | $106,014 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Cedar lake vs Arvada
- The population in Arvada is higher at 121,581, compared to 15,592 in Cedar lake.
- The median age in Arvada is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 39.5 years in Cedar lake.
- Arvada has a higher median income of $106,014, compared to $84,444 in Cedar lake.
- In Arvada, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 40.0% in Cedar lake.
- The poverty level is higher in Arvada at 6%, compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
- Arvada has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar lake vs Arvada provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar lake | Arvada |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 94 | 73 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Arvada
- In Arvada, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- Cedar lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 73% in Arvada.
- In Arvada, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cedar lake.
- Arvada has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Arvada at 9%, compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar lake and Arvada at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar lake | Arvada |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 13.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 22.1% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 24.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Arvada
- More residents in Cedar lake report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.3% in Arvada.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar lake at 25.4% compared to 20.9% in Arvada.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar lake at 18.8% compared to 13.8% in Arvada.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Arvada at 22.1% compared to 19.8% in Cedar lake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar lake at 37.2% compared to 24.6% in Arvada.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Arvada at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar lake | Arvada |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (67) | 0.4% (483) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (3,292) | 12.7% (15,387) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (1,102) | 6.6% (8,032) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (2,204) | 35.1% (42,624) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar lake vs Arvada
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cedar lake and Arvada at 0.4%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 12.7% in Arvada.
- More residents in Cedar lake have less than a high school education at 7.1% compared to 6.6% in Arvada.
- In Arvada, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.1% compared to 14.1% in Cedar lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.