Demographics details for Cedar hill, TX vs Waterproof, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar hill, TX vs Waterproof, LA.
| Data | Cedar hill | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,341 | 499 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $84,132 | $21,953 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 9.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Cedar hill vs Waterproof
- In Cedar hill, the population is higher at 48,341, compared to 499 in Waterproof.
- The median age in Waterproof is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132 compared to $21,953 in Waterproof.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar hill at 38.0% compared to 9.0% in Waterproof.
- The poverty level is higher in Waterproof at 30%, compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- Waterproof has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.9% in Cedar hill.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar hill vs Waterproof provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar hill | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 51 | 103 |
| White | 11 | -12 |
| Asian | 2 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 27 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Waterproof
- In Waterproof, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 103% compared to 51% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 11% compared to -12% in Waterproof.
- In Waterproof, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Cedar hill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar hill at 27% compared to 0% in Waterproof.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar hill at 9% compared to 2% in Waterproof.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar hill and Waterproof at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar hill | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 24.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 20.0% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 33.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 53.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Waterproof
- In Waterproof, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 24.5% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waterproof at 25.1% versus 20.5% in Cedar hill.
- Waterproof has a higher smoking rate at 33.7% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 11.8% in Waterproof.
- Waterproof has higher obesity rates at 53.1% compared to 35.9% in Cedar hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waterproof at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar hill | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (578) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,465) | 27.7% (138) |
| Less than High School | 10.2% (4,909) | 10.6% (53) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (8,890) | 12.8% (64) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar hill vs Waterproof
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar hill have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Waterproof.
- In Waterproof, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.7% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waterproof at 10.6%, compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 12.8% in Waterproof.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.