Demographics details for Cedar hill, TX vs South gate, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar hill, TX vs South gate, CA.
| Data | Cedar hill | South gate |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,341 | 90,926 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $84,132 | $67,188 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Cedar hill vs South gate
- The population in South gate is higher at 90,926, compared to 48,341 in Cedar hill.
- Residents in Cedar hill have a higher median age of 35.3 years compared to 33.7 years in South gate.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132 compared to $67,188 in South gate.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar hill at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in South gate.
- The poverty level is higher in South gate at 18%, compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- South gate has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 4.9% in Cedar hill.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar hill vs South gate provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar hill | South gate |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 51 | 1 |
| White | 11 | -21 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 97 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar hill vs South gate
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar hill at 51% compared to 1% in South gate.
- Cedar hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 11% compared to -21% in South gate.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar hill at 2% compared to 1% in South gate.
- South gate has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 27% in Cedar hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South gate at 21%, compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- In South gate, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cedar hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar hill | South gate |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 16.3% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar hill vs South gate
- In South gate, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar hill at 20.5% compared to 16.3% in South gate.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar hill at 14.8% compared to 12.7% in South gate.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar hill at 35.9% compared to 34.1% in South gate.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cedar hill at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in South gate.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar hill | South gate |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (578) | 4.6% (4,160) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,465) | 14.9% (13,536) |
| Less than High School | 10.2% (4,909) | 53.3% (48,481) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (8,890) | 7.5% (6,822) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar hill vs South gate
- In South gate, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 1.2% in Cedar hill.
- In South gate, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South gate at 53.3%, compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 7.5% in South gate.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.