Demographics details for Cedar hill, TX vs San mateo, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar hill, TX vs San mateo, CA.
Data | Cedar hill | San mateo |
---|---|---|
Population | 48,341 | 100,984 |
Median Age | 35.3 years | 38.1 years |
Median Income | $84,132 | $149,152 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Cedar hill vs San mateo
- The population in San mateo is higher at 100,984, compared to 48,341 in Cedar hill.
- The median age in San mateo is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- San mateo has a higher median income of $149,152, compared to $84,132 in Cedar hill.
- In San mateo, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 38.0% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in San mateo.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar hill is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.4% in San mateo.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar hill vs San mateo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cedar hill | San mateo |
---|---|---|
Black | 51 | 2 |
White | 11 | 32 |
Asian | 2 | 28 |
Hispanic | 27 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar hill vs San mateo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar hill at 51% compared to 2% in San mateo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in San mateo at 32% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- In San mateo, the Asian population stands at 28%, greater than 2% in Cedar hill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar hill at 27% compared to 25% in San mateo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San mateo at 12%, compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- In San mateo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cedar hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cedar hill | San mateo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 13.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 8.4% |
Depression | 20.5% | 15.5% |
Smoking | 14.8% | 8.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 35.9% | 22.8% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar hill vs San mateo
- More residents in Cedar hill report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 13.1% in San mateo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar hill at 20.5% compared to 15.5% in San mateo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar hill at 14.8% compared to 8.7% in San mateo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 16.2% in San mateo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar hill at 35.9% compared to 22.8% in San mateo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cedar hill at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in San mateo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cedar hill | San mateo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (578) | 1.8% (1,834) |
High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,465) | 8.2% (8,262) |
Less than High School | 10.2% (4,909) | 11.5% (11,608) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (8,890) | 44.1% (44,508) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar hill vs San mateo
- In San mateo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.2% in Cedar hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar hill hold a high school diploma at 13.4% compared to 8.2% in San mateo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San mateo at 11.5%, compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
- In San mateo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.1% compared to 18.4% in Cedar hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.