Demographics details for Cedar hill, TX vs Onalaska, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar hill, TX vs Onalaska, TX.
| Data | Cedar hill | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,341 | 3,205 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $84,132 | $56,168 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Cedar hill vs Onalaska
- In Cedar hill, the population is higher at 48,341, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- The median age in Onalaska is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132 compared to $56,168 in Onalaska.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar hill at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Onalaska.
- The poverty level is higher in Onalaska at 12%, compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar hill is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.5% in Onalaska.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar hill vs Onalaska provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar hill | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 51 | 1 |
| White | 11 | 91 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Onalaska
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar hill at 51% compared to 1% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Onalaska at 91% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar hill at 2% compared to 0% in Onalaska.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar hill at 27% compared to 3% in Onalaska.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar hill at 9% compared to 5% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar hill and Onalaska at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar hill | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Onalaska
- In Onalaska, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Onalaska at 26.0% versus 20.5% in Cedar hill.
- Onalaska has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 17.7% in Cedar hill.
- Onalaska has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 35.9% in Cedar hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar hill | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (578) | 0.7% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,465) | 15.3% (491) |
| Less than High School | 10.2% (4,909) | 21.5% (689) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (8,890) | 5.0% (161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar hill vs Onalaska
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar hill have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Onalaska.
- In Onalaska, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Onalaska at 21.5%, compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.