Demographics details for Cedar hill, TX vs Maquoketa, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar hill, TX vs Maquoketa, IA.
| Data | Cedar hill | Maquoketa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,341 | 6,054 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 40.8 years |
| Median Income | $84,132 | $53,462 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Cedar hill vs Maquoketa
- In Cedar hill, the population is higher at 48,341, compared to 6,054 in Maquoketa.
- The median age in Maquoketa is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132 compared to $53,462 in Maquoketa.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Cedar hill and Maquoketa at 38.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Maquoketa at 11%, compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar hill is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.2% in Maquoketa.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar hill vs Maquoketa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar hill | Maquoketa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 51 | 2 |
| White | 11 | 96 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Maquoketa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar hill at 51% compared to 2% in Maquoketa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Maquoketa at 96% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar hill at 2% compared to 0% in Maquoketa.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar hill at 27% compared to 1% in Maquoketa.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar hill at 9% compared to 1% in Maquoketa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar hill and Maquoketa at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar hill | Maquoketa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 20.7% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 39.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Maquoketa
- In Maquoketa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 20.5%.
- Maquoketa has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Maquoketa at 20.7% compared to 17.7% in Cedar hill.
- Maquoketa has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 35.9% in Cedar hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Maquoketa at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar hill | Maquoketa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (578) | 0.2% (12) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,465) | 28.0% (1,696) |
| Less than High School | 10.2% (4,909) | 5.3% (323) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (8,890) | 11.1% (673) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar hill vs Maquoketa
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar hill have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.2% in Maquoketa.
- In Maquoketa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.0% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- More residents in Cedar hill have less than a high school education at 10.2% compared to 5.3% in Maquoketa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 11.1% in Maquoketa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.