Demographics details for Cedar hill, TX vs Lansing, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar hill, TX vs Lansing, MI.
| Data | Cedar hill | Lansing |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,341 | 112,537 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 32.9 years |
| Median Income | $84,132 | $50,747 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 7.4 |
Population Comparison: Cedar hill vs Lansing
- The population in Lansing is higher at 112,537, compared to 48,341 in Cedar hill.
- Residents in Cedar hill have a higher median age of 35.3 years compared to 32.9 years in Lansing.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132 compared to $50,747 in Lansing.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar hill at 38.0% compared to 28.0% in Lansing.
- The poverty level is higher in Lansing at 19%, compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- Lansing has a higher unemployment rate at 7.4% compared to 4.9% in Cedar hill.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar hill vs Lansing provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar hill | Lansing |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 51 | 24 |
| White | 11 | 48 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Lansing
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar hill at 51% compared to 24% in Lansing.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lansing at 48% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- In Lansing, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Cedar hill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar hill at 27% compared to 13% in Lansing.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lansing at 10%, compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar hill and Lansing at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar hill | Lansing |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Lansing
- In Lansing, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lansing at 26.3% versus 20.5% in Cedar hill.
- Lansing has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 16.0% in Lansing.
- Lansing has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 35.9% in Cedar hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lansing at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar hill | Lansing |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (578) | 1.3% (1,419) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,465) | 13.5% (15,216) |
| Less than High School | 10.2% (4,909) | 10.0% (11,269) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (8,890) | 19.3% (21,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar hill vs Lansing
- In Lansing, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Cedar hill.
- In Lansing, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.5% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- More residents in Cedar hill have less than a high school education at 10.2% compared to 10.0% in Lansing.
- In Lansing, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 18.4% in Cedar hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.