Demographics details for Cedar hill, TX vs Janesville, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar hill, TX vs Janesville, WI.
Data | Cedar hill | Janesville |
---|---|---|
Population | 48,341 | 65,911 |
Median Age | 35.3 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $84,132 | $68,610 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Cedar hill vs Janesville
- The population in Janesville is higher at 65,911, compared to 48,341 in Cedar hill.
- The median age in Janesville is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132 compared to $68,610 in Janesville.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Cedar hill and Janesville at 38.0%.
- The poverty level is identical in both Cedar hill and Janesville at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar hill is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.2% in Janesville.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar hill vs Janesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cedar hill | Janesville |
---|---|---|
Black | 51 | 3 |
White | 11 | 85 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 27 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Janesville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar hill at 51% compared to 3% in Janesville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Janesville at 85% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- Both Cedar hill and Janesville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar hill at 27% compared to 5% in Janesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar hill at 9% compared to 5% in Janesville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar hill and Janesville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cedar hill | Janesville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 10.2% |
Depression | 20.5% | 25.1% |
Smoking | 14.8% | 16.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 23.4% |
Obesity | 35.9% | 34.1% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Janesville
- More residents in Cedar hill report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 14.8% in Janesville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Janesville at 25.1% versus 20.5% in Cedar hill.
- Janesville has a higher smoking rate at 16.1% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Janesville at 23.4% compared to 17.7% in Cedar hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar hill at 35.9% compared to 34.1% in Janesville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Janesville at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cedar hill | Janesville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (578) | 0.5% (330) |
High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,465) | 20.4% (13,471) |
Less than High School | 10.2% (4,909) | 8.0% (5,276) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (8,890) | 18.1% (11,899) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar hill vs Janesville
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar hill have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Janesville.
- In Janesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- More residents in Cedar hill have less than a high school education at 10.2% compared to 8.0% in Janesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 18.1% in Janesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.