Demographics details for Cedar hill, TX vs Ehrhardt, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar hill, TX vs Ehrhardt, SC.
| Data | Cedar hill | Ehrhardt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,341 | 438 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 63.5 years |
| Median Income | $84,132 | $35,923 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 56.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Cedar hill vs Ehrhardt
- In Cedar hill, the population is higher at 48,341, compared to 438 in Ehrhardt.
- The median age in Ehrhardt is higher at 63.5 years, compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132 compared to $35,923 in Ehrhardt.
- In Ehrhardt, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 38.0% in Cedar hill.
- The poverty level is higher in Ehrhardt at 19%, compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- Ehrhardt has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.9% in Cedar hill.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar hill vs Ehrhardt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar hill | Ehrhardt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 51 | 50 |
| White | 11 | 50 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Ehrhardt
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar hill at 51% compared to 50% in Ehrhardt.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ehrhardt at 50% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar hill at 2% compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar hill at 27% compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar hill at 9% compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar hill and Ehrhardt at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar hill | Ehrhardt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Ehrhardt
- In Ehrhardt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar hill at 20.5% compared to 20.1% in Ehrhardt.
- Ehrhardt has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 16.1% in Ehrhardt.
- Ehrhardt has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 35.9% in Cedar hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ehrhardt at 30.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar hill | Ehrhardt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (578) | 3.0% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,465) | 26.9% (118) |
| Less than High School | 10.2% (4,909) | 23.5% (103) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (8,890) | 27.2% (119) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar hill vs Ehrhardt
- In Ehrhardt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.2% in Cedar hill.
- In Ehrhardt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ehrhardt at 23.5%, compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
- In Ehrhardt, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.2% compared to 18.4% in Cedar hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.