Demographics details for Cedar hill, TX vs Apopka, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar hill, TX vs Apopka, FL.
| Data | Cedar hill | Apopka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,341 | 57,017 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 38.9 years |
| Median Income | $84,132 | $87,394 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cedar hill vs Apopka
- The population in Apopka is higher at 57,017, compared to 48,341 in Cedar hill.
- The median age in Apopka is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Apopka has a higher median income of $87,394, compared to $84,132 in Cedar hill.
- In Apopka, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in Cedar hill.
- The poverty level is identical in both Cedar hill and Apopka at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar hill is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.5% in Apopka.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar hill vs Apopka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar hill | Apopka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 51 | 24 |
| White | 11 | 30 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Apopka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar hill at 51% compared to 24% in Apopka.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Apopka at 30% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- In Apopka, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Cedar hill.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Cedar hill and Apopka at 27%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Apopka at 15%, compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar hill and Apopka at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar hill | Apopka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 29.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar hill vs Apopka
- More residents in Cedar hill report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 15.9% in Apopka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar hill at 20.5% compared to 17.9% in Apopka.
- Apopka has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 14.7% in Apopka.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar hill at 35.9% compared to 29.8% in Apopka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cedar hill at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Apopka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar hill | Apopka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (578) | 0.9% (499) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,465) | 13.1% (7,455) |
| Less than High School | 10.2% (4,909) | 12.3% (7,016) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (8,890) | 23.4% (13,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar hill vs Apopka
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar hill have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Apopka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar hill hold a high school diploma at 13.4% compared to 13.1% in Apopka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Apopka at 12.3%, compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
- In Apopka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 18.4% in Cedar hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.