Demographics details for Cedar grove, WV vs Richmond hill, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar grove, WV vs Richmond hill, GA.
Data | Cedar grove | Richmond hill |
---|---|---|
Population | 693 | 18,091 |
Median Age | 44.3 years | 31.0 years |
Median Income | $55,600 | $83,519 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cedar grove vs Richmond hill
- The population in Richmond hill is higher at 18,091, compared to 693 in Cedar grove.
- Residents in Cedar grove have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 31.0 years in Richmond hill.
- Richmond hill has a higher median income of $83,519, compared to $55,600 in Cedar grove.
- In Richmond hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Cedar grove.
- Cedar grove has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Richmond hill.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar grove is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Richmond hill.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar grove vs Richmond hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cedar grove | Richmond hill |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 13 |
White | 98 | 66 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 11 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Richmond hill
- In Richmond hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
- Cedar grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 66% in Richmond hill.
- In Richmond hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cedar grove.
- Richmond hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richmond hill at 8%, compared to 2% in Cedar grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar grove and Richmond hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cedar grove | Richmond hill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.3% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | 10.6% |
Depression | 30.1% | 21.8% |
Smoking | 24.6% | 14.2% |
Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 40.4% | 34.4% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Richmond hill
- More residents in Cedar grove report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 15.9% in Richmond hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar grove at 30.1% compared to 21.8% in Richmond hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar grove at 24.6% compared to 14.2% in Richmond hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Richmond hill at 16.2% compared to 13.9% in Cedar grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar grove at 40.4% compared to 34.4% in Richmond hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cedar grove at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Richmond hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cedar grove | Richmond hill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (4) | 0.0% (9) |
High School Diploma | 21.2% (147) | 7.7% (1,395) |
Less than High School | 18.5% (128) | 5.7% (1,037) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.3% (16) | 19.5% (3,532) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar grove vs Richmond hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar grove have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Richmond hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar grove hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 7.7% in Richmond hill.
- More residents in Cedar grove have less than a high school education at 18.5% compared to 5.7% in Richmond hill.
- In Richmond hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 2.3% in Cedar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.