Demographics details for Cedar grove, WV vs Richmond hill, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedar grove, WV vs Richmond hill, GA.

Data Cedar grove Richmond hill
Population 693 18,091
Median Age 44.3 years 31.0 years
Median Income $55,600 $83,519
Married Families 31.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Cedar grove vs Richmond hill

  • The population in Richmond hill is higher at 18,091, compared to 693 in Cedar grove.
  • Residents in Cedar grove have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 31.0 years in Richmond hill.
  • Richmond hill has a higher median income of $83,519, compared to $55,600 in Cedar grove.
  • In Richmond hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Cedar grove has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Richmond hill.
  • The unemployment rate in Cedar grove is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Richmond hill.

Demographics

Demographics Cedar grove vs Richmond hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedar grove Richmond hill
Black Data is updating 13
White 98 66
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 11
Two or More Races 2 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Richmond hill

  • In Richmond hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
  • Cedar grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 66% in Richmond hill.
  • In Richmond hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cedar grove.
  • Richmond hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richmond hill at 8%, compared to 2% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar grove and Richmond hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedar grove Richmond hill
Mental Health Not Good 22.3% 15.9%
Physical Health Not Good 15.7% 10.6%
Depression 30.1% 21.8%
Smoking 24.6% 14.2%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 16.2%
Obesity 40.4% 34.4%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Richmond hill

  • More residents in Cedar grove report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 15.9% in Richmond hill.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cedar grove at 30.1% compared to 21.8% in Richmond hill.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar grove at 24.6% compared to 14.2% in Richmond hill.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Richmond hill at 16.2% compared to 13.9% in Cedar grove.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cedar grove at 40.4% compared to 34.4% in Richmond hill.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cedar grove at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Richmond hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedar grove Richmond hill
No Schooling 0.6% (4) 0.0% (9)
High School Diploma 21.2% (147) 7.7% (1,395)
Less than High School 18.5% (128) 5.7% (1,037)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.3% (16) 19.5% (3,532)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedar grove vs Richmond hill

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cedar grove have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Richmond hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cedar grove hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 7.7% in Richmond hill.
  • More residents in Cedar grove have less than a high school education at 18.5% compared to 5.7% in Richmond hill.
  • In Richmond hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 2.3% in Cedar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.