Demographics details for Cedar grove, WV vs Pea ridge, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar grove, WV vs Pea ridge, AR.
| Data | Cedar grove | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 693 | 7,852 |
| Median Age | 44.3 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $55,600 | $93,113 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cedar grove vs Pea ridge
- The population in Pea ridge is higher at 7,852, compared to 693 in Cedar grove.
- Residents in Cedar grove have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 35.6 years in Pea ridge.
- Pea ridge has a higher median income of $93,113, compared to $55,600 in Cedar grove.
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 31.0% in Cedar grove.
- Cedar grove has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Pea ridge.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar grove is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Pea ridge.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar grove vs Pea ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar grove | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 98 | 70 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Pea ridge
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
- Cedar grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 70% in Pea ridge.
- In Pea ridge, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Cedar grove.
- Pea ridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pea ridge at 15%, compared to 2% in Cedar grove.
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar grove | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.3% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 30.1% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 40.4% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Pea ridge
- More residents in Cedar grove report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 18.0% in Pea ridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar grove at 30.1% compared to 25.0% in Pea ridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar grove at 24.6% compared to 17.9% in Pea ridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pea ridge at 17.0% compared to 13.9% in Cedar grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar grove at 40.4% compared to 34.8% in Pea ridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cedar grove at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Pea ridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar grove | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (4) | 0.3% (23) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (147) | 17.7% (1,390) |
| Less than High School | 18.5% (128) | 9.8% (773) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.3% (16) | 14.4% (1,131) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar grove vs Pea ridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar grove have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Pea ridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar grove hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 17.7% in Pea ridge.
- More residents in Cedar grove have less than a high school education at 18.5% compared to 9.8% in Pea ridge.
- In Pea ridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 2.3% in Cedar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.