Demographics details for Cedar grove, WV vs Mcminnville, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedar grove, WV vs Mcminnville, OR.

Data Cedar grove Mcminnville
Population 693 34,530
Median Age 44.3 years 40.1 years
Median Income $55,600 $65,318
Married Families 31.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.9

Population Comparison: Cedar grove vs Mcminnville

  • The population in Mcminnville is higher at 34,530, compared to 693 in Cedar grove.
  • Residents in Cedar grove have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 40.1 years in Mcminnville.
  • Mcminnville has a higher median income of $65,318, compared to $55,600 in Cedar grove.
  • In Mcminnville, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Cedar grove has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Mcminnville.
  • The unemployment rate in Cedar grove is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.9% in Mcminnville.

Demographics

Demographics Cedar grove vs Mcminnville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedar grove Mcminnville
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 98 67
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 18
Two or More Races 2 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Mcminnville

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cedar grove and Mcminnville at 0%.
  • Cedar grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 67% in Mcminnville.
  • In Mcminnville, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cedar grove.
  • Mcminnville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mcminnville at 12%, compared to 2% in Cedar grove.
  • In Mcminnville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cedar grove.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedar grove Mcminnville
Mental Health Not Good 22.3% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 15.7% 11.6%
Depression 30.1% 27.2%
Smoking 24.6% 15.6%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 17.6%
Obesity 40.4% 35.1%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Mcminnville

  • More residents in Cedar grove report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 18.3% in Mcminnville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cedar grove at 30.1% compared to 27.2% in Mcminnville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar grove at 24.6% compared to 15.6% in Mcminnville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mcminnville at 17.6% compared to 13.9% in Cedar grove.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cedar grove at 40.4% compared to 35.1% in Mcminnville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cedar grove at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Mcminnville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedar grove Mcminnville
No Schooling 0.6% (4) 1.4% (472)
High School Diploma 21.2% (147) 11.9% (4,114)
Less than High School 18.5% (128) 16.8% (5,808)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.3% (16) 17.7% (6,118)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedar grove vs Mcminnville

  • In Mcminnville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Cedar grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cedar grove hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 11.9% in Mcminnville.
  • More residents in Cedar grove have less than a high school education at 18.5% compared to 16.8% in Mcminnville.
  • In Mcminnville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 2.3% in Cedar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.