Demographics details for Cedar grove, WV vs Brundidge, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedar grove, WV vs Brundidge, AL.

Data Cedar grove Brundidge
Population 693 2,034
Median Age 44.3 years 49.9 years
Median Income $55,600 $37,627
Married Families 31.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 12% 20%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Cedar grove vs Brundidge

  • The population in Brundidge is higher at 2,034, compared to 693 in Cedar grove.
  • The median age in Brundidge is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 44.3 years in Cedar grove.
  • Cedar grove has a higher median income of $55,600 compared to $37,627 in Brundidge.
  • In Brundidge, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 31.0% in Cedar grove.
  • The poverty level is higher in Brundidge at 20%, compared to 12% in Cedar grove.
  • The unemployment rate in Cedar grove is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Brundidge.

Demographics

Demographics Cedar grove vs Brundidge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedar grove Brundidge
Black Data is updating 67
White 98 12
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 16
Two or More Races 2 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Brundidge

  • In Brundidge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 67% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
  • Cedar grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 12% in Brundidge.
  • Both Cedar grove and Brundidge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Brundidge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Brundidge at 5%, compared to 2% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar grove and Brundidge at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedar grove Brundidge
Mental Health Not Good 22.3% 20.5%
Physical Health Not Good 15.7% 15.2%
Depression 30.1% 20.7%
Smoking 24.6% 23.1%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 12.2%
Obesity 40.4% 45.7%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Brundidge

  • More residents in Cedar grove report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 20.5% in Brundidge.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cedar grove at 30.1% compared to 20.7% in Brundidge.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar grove at 24.6% compared to 23.1% in Brundidge.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cedar grove at 13.9% compared to 12.2% in Brundidge.
  • Brundidge has higher obesity rates at 45.7% compared to 40.4% in Cedar grove.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brundidge at 25.0% compared to 20.0% in Cedar grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedar grove Brundidge
No Schooling 0.6% (4) 0.5% (11)
High School Diploma 21.2% (147) 35.9% (731)
Less than High School 18.5% (128) 22.7% (461)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.3% (16) 11.8% (240)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedar grove vs Brundidge

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cedar grove have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Brundidge.
  • In Brundidge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.9% compared to 21.2% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brundidge at 22.7%, compared to 18.5% in Cedar grove.
  • In Brundidge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 2.3% in Cedar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.