Demographics details for Cedar grove, NJ vs Carlisle, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar grove, NJ vs Carlisle, IN.
| Data | Cedar grove | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,549 | 618 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 52.6 years |
| Median Income | $107,500 | $49,250 |
| Married Families | 68.2% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Cedar grove vs Carlisle
- In Cedar grove, the population is higher at 12,549, compared to 618 in Carlisle.
- The median age in Carlisle is higher at 52.6 years, compared to 42.5 years in Cedar grove.
- Cedar grove has a higher median income of $107,500 compared to $49,250 in Carlisle.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar grove at 68.2% compared to 36.0% in Carlisle.
- The poverty level is higher in Carlisle at 9%, compared to 5% in Cedar grove.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar grove is higher at 3.3%, compared to 3.2% in Carlisle.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar grove vs Carlisle provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar grove | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1.2 | 2 |
| White | 89.5 | 93 |
| Asian | 5.2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3.1 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1.0 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Carlisle
- In Carlisle, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1.2% in Cedar grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carlisle at 93% compared to 89.5% in Cedar grove.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar grove at 5.2% compared to 0% in Carlisle.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar grove at 3.1% compared to 0% in Carlisle.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carlisle at 5%, compared to 1.0% in Cedar grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar grove and Carlisle at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar grove | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.5% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 37.0% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Carlisle
- In Carlisle, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carlisle at 27.0% versus 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- Carlisle has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carlisle at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- Carlisle has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carlisle at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar grove | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 28.8% (178) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.9% (24) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 6.0% (37) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar grove vs Carlisle
- In Carlisle, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- In Carlisle, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carlisle at 3.9%, compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- In Carlisle, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.