Demographics details for Cedar grove, NJ vs Beaver dam, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedar grove, NJ vs Beaver dam, WI.

Data Cedar grove Beaver dam
Population 12,549 16,582
Median Age 42.5 years 40.4 years
Median Income $107,500 $65,802
Married Families 68.2% 35.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.3 3.1

Population Comparison: Cedar grove vs Beaver dam

  • The population in Beaver dam is higher at 16,582, compared to 12,549 in Cedar grove.
  • Residents in Cedar grove have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 40.4 years in Beaver dam.
  • Cedar grove has a higher median income of $107,500 compared to $65,802 in Beaver dam.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar grove at 68.2% compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
  • Cedar grove has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
  • The unemployment rate in Cedar grove is higher at 3.3%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.

Demographics

Demographics Cedar grove vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedar grove Beaver dam
Black 1.2 3
White 89.5 81
Asian 5.2 2
Hispanic 3.1 8
Two or More Races 1.0 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Beaver dam

  • In Beaver dam, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1.2% in Cedar grove.
  • Cedar grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 89.5% compared to 81% in Beaver dam.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cedar grove at 5.2% compared to 2% in Beaver dam.
  • Beaver dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3.1% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaver dam at 6%, compared to 1.0% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar grove and Beaver dam at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedar grove Beaver dam
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.6%
Depression Data is updating% 23.6%
Smoking Data is updating% 17.6%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 23.5%
Obesity Data is updating% 36.6%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar grove vs Beaver dam

  • In Beaver dam, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Beaver dam at 23.6% versus 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Beaver dam has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Beaver dam has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beaver dam at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedar grove Beaver dam
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (47)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 23.8% (3,947)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 10.3% (1,706)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 18.2% (3,023)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedar grove vs Beaver dam

  • In Beaver dam, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • In Beaver dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaver dam at 10.3%, compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • In Beaver dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.