Demographics details for Cedar falls, IA vs Young harris, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar falls, IA vs Young harris, GA.
| Data | Cedar falls | Young harris |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,746 | 810 |
| Median Age | 28.0 years | 20.4 years |
| Median Income | $71,011 | $27,500 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cedar falls vs Young harris
- In Cedar falls, the population is higher at 40,746, compared to 810 in Young harris.
- Residents in Cedar falls have a higher median age of 28.0 years compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
- Cedar falls has a higher median income of $71,011 compared to $27,500 in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar falls at 36.0% compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
- Cedar falls has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Young harris.
- Young harris has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.9% in Cedar falls.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar falls vs Young harris provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar falls | Young harris |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 14 |
| White | 90 | 70 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar falls vs Young harris
- In Young harris, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 1% in Cedar falls.
- Cedar falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 70% in Young harris.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar falls at 4% compared to 0% in Young harris.
- Young harris has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 3% in Cedar falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Young harris at 3%, compared to 2% in Cedar falls.
- In Young harris, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Cedar falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar falls | Young harris |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 19.8% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.2% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar falls vs Young harris
- In Young harris, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.5% in Cedar falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Young harris at 23.4% versus 19.8% in Cedar falls.
- Young harris has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 14.9% in Cedar falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar falls at 22.2% compared to 16.9% in Young harris.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar falls at 34.8% compared to 33.5% in Young harris.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Young harris at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar falls | Young harris |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (43) | 0.2% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 9.6% (3,893) | 5.7% (46) |
| Less than High School | 2.8% (1,147) | 4.4% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.8% (10,913) | 9.3% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar falls vs Young harris
- In Young harris, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.1% in Cedar falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar falls hold a high school diploma at 9.6% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Young harris at 4.4%, compared to 2.8% in Cedar falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 9.3% in Young harris.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.