Demographics details for Cedar falls, IA vs Sterling, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar falls, IA vs Sterling, OK.
| Data | Cedar falls | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,746 | 678 |
| Median Age | 28.0 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $71,011 | $64,464 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cedar falls vs Sterling
- In Cedar falls, the population is higher at 40,746, compared to 678 in Sterling.
- The median age in Sterling is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 28.0 years in Cedar falls.
- Cedar falls has a higher median income of $71,011 compared to $64,464 in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 36.0% in Cedar falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 8% in Cedar falls.
- Sterling has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.9% in Cedar falls.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar falls vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar falls | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 90 | 82 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar falls vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar falls at 1% compared to 0% in Sterling.
- Cedar falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 82% in Sterling.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar falls at 4% compared to 1% in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Cedar falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling at 11%, compared to 2% in Cedar falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar falls and Sterling at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar falls | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 19.8% | 28.2% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.2% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 42.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 40.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar falls vs Sterling
- In Sterling, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.5% in Cedar falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling at 28.2% versus 19.8% in Cedar falls.
- Sterling has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 14.9% in Cedar falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar falls at 22.2% compared to 16.4% in Sterling.
- Sterling has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 34.8% in Cedar falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling at 40.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar falls | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (43) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 9.6% (3,893) | 45.0% (305) |
| Less than High School | 2.8% (1,147) | 11.2% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.8% (10,913) | 6.5% (44) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar falls vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar falls have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 45.0% compared to 9.6% in Cedar falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling at 11.2%, compared to 2.8% in Cedar falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 6.5% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.