Demographics details for Cedar falls, IA vs Port gibson, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar falls, IA vs Port gibson, MS.
| Data | Cedar falls | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,746 | 1,206 |
| Median Age | 28.0 years | 47.3 years |
| Median Income | $71,011 | $24,773 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Cedar falls vs Port gibson
- In Cedar falls, the population is higher at 40,746, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- The median age in Port gibson is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 28.0 years in Cedar falls.
- Cedar falls has a higher median income of $71,011 compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar falls at 36.0% compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- The poverty level is higher in Port gibson at 30%, compared to 8% in Cedar falls.
- Port gibson has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 2.9% in Cedar falls.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar falls vs Port gibson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar falls | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 82 |
| White | 90 | 12 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar falls vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 82% compared to 1% in Cedar falls.
- Cedar falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar falls at 4% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar falls at 3% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port gibson at 6%, compared to 2% in Cedar falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar falls and Port gibson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar falls | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 19.8% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.2% | 10.2% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 50.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar falls vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.5% in Cedar falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port gibson at 20.0% versus 19.8% in Cedar falls.
- Port gibson has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 14.9% in Cedar falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar falls at 22.2% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 34.8% in Cedar falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar falls | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (43) | 0.5% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 9.6% (3,893) | 9.8% (118) |
| Less than High School | 2.8% (1,147) | 13.3% (160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.8% (10,913) | 21.2% (256) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar falls vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Cedar falls.
- In Port gibson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.8% compared to 9.6% in Cedar falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port gibson at 13.3%, compared to 2.8% in Cedar falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 21.2% in Port gibson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.