Demographics details for Cedar falls, IA vs Pea ridge, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar falls, IA vs Pea ridge, AR.
| Data | Cedar falls | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,746 | 7,852 |
| Median Age | 28.0 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $71,011 | $93,113 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cedar falls vs Pea ridge
- In Cedar falls, the population is higher at 40,746, compared to 7,852 in Pea ridge.
- The median age in Pea ridge is higher at 35.6 years, compared to 28.0 years in Cedar falls.
- Pea ridge has a higher median income of $93,113, compared to $71,011 in Cedar falls.
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 36.0% in Cedar falls.
- The poverty level is identical in both Cedar falls and Pea ridge at 8%.
- Pea ridge has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.9% in Cedar falls.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar falls vs Pea ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar falls | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 90 | 70 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar falls vs Pea ridge
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Cedar falls.
- Cedar falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 70% in Pea ridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar falls at 4% compared to 1% in Pea ridge.
- Pea ridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Cedar falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pea ridge at 15%, compared to 2% in Cedar falls.
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cedar falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar falls | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 19.8% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.2% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar falls vs Pea ridge
- In Pea ridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.5% in Cedar falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pea ridge at 25.0% versus 19.8% in Cedar falls.
- Pea ridge has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 14.9% in Cedar falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar falls at 22.2% compared to 17.0% in Pea ridge.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 34.8%.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pea ridge at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar falls | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (43) | 0.3% (23) |
| High School Diploma | 9.6% (3,893) | 17.7% (1,390) |
| Less than High School | 2.8% (1,147) | 9.8% (773) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.8% (10,913) | 14.4% (1,131) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar falls vs Pea ridge
- In Pea ridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Cedar falls.
- In Pea ridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 9.6% in Cedar falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pea ridge at 9.8%, compared to 2.8% in Cedar falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 14.4% in Pea ridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.