Demographics details for Cedar falls, IA vs Manteca, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar falls, IA vs Manteca, CA.
Data | Cedar falls | Manteca |
---|---|---|
Population | 40,746 | 86,928 |
Median Age | 28.0 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $71,011 | $89,966 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Cedar falls vs Manteca
- The population in Manteca is higher at 86,928, compared to 40,746 in Cedar falls.
- The median age in Manteca is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 28.0 years in Cedar falls.
- Manteca has a higher median income of $89,966, compared to $71,011 in Cedar falls.
- In Manteca, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Cedar falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Manteca at 10%, compared to 8% in Cedar falls.
- Manteca has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 2.9% in Cedar falls.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar falls vs Manteca provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cedar falls | Manteca |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 3 |
White | 90 | 26 |
Asian | 4 | 14 |
Hispanic | 3 | 39 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 17 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar falls vs Manteca
- In Manteca, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Cedar falls.
- Cedar falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 26% in Manteca.
- In Manteca, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 4% in Cedar falls.
- Manteca has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 3% in Cedar falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Manteca at 17%, compared to 2% in Cedar falls.
- In Manteca, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cedar falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cedar falls | Manteca |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 11.8% |
Depression | 19.8% | 18.2% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 13.8% |
Binge Drinking | 22.2% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 34.8% | 34.1% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar falls vs Manteca
- In Manteca, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.5% in Cedar falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar falls at 19.8% compared to 18.2% in Manteca.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar falls at 14.9% compared to 13.8% in Manteca.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar falls at 22.2% compared to 16.6% in Manteca.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar falls at 34.8% compared to 34.1% in Manteca.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Manteca at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cedar falls | Manteca |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (43) | 1.7% (1,490) |
High School Diploma | 9.6% (3,893) | 17.0% (14,775) |
Less than High School | 2.8% (1,147) | 16.5% (14,304) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.8% (10,913) | 12.4% (10,753) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar falls vs Manteca
- In Manteca, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.1% in Cedar falls.
- In Manteca, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 9.6% in Cedar falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manteca at 16.5%, compared to 2.8% in Cedar falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 12.4% in Manteca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.