Demographics details for Cedar falls, IA vs Charleston, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedar falls, IA vs Charleston, IL.

Data Cedar falls Charleston
Population 40,746 17,119
Median Age 28.0 years 29.4 years
Median Income $71,011 $47,533
Married Families 36.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 8% 15%
Unemployment Rate 2.9 5.3

Population Comparison: Cedar falls vs Charleston

  • In Cedar falls, the population is higher at 40,746, compared to 17,119 in Charleston.
  • The median age in Charleston is higher at 29.4 years, compared to 28.0 years in Cedar falls.
  • Cedar falls has a higher median income of $71,011 compared to $47,533 in Charleston.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar falls at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Charleston.
  • The poverty level is higher in Charleston at 15%, compared to 8% in Cedar falls.
  • Charleston has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 2.9% in Cedar falls.

Demographics

Demographics Cedar falls vs Charleston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedar falls Charleston
Black 1 8
White 90 83
Asian 4 2
Hispanic 3 4
Two or More Races 2 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cedar falls vs Charleston

  • In Charleston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Cedar falls.
  • Cedar falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 83% in Charleston.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cedar falls at 4% compared to 2% in Charleston.
  • Charleston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Cedar falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Charleston at 3%, compared to 2% in Cedar falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar falls and Charleston at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedar falls Charleston
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 12.5%
Depression 19.8% 24.2%
Smoking 14.9% 20.0%
Binge Drinking 22.2% 16.4%
Obesity 34.8% 36.5%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar falls vs Charleston

  • In Charleston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.5% in Cedar falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Charleston at 24.2% versus 19.8% in Cedar falls.
  • Charleston has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 14.9% in Cedar falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cedar falls at 22.2% compared to 16.4% in Charleston.
  • Charleston has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 34.8% in Cedar falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Charleston at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedar falls Charleston
No Schooling 0.1% (43) 0.4% (68)
High School Diploma 9.6% (3,893) 13.6% (2,331)
Less than High School 2.8% (1,147) 8.1% (1,387)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.8% (10,913) 19.3% (3,307)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedar falls vs Charleston

  • In Charleston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Cedar falls.
  • In Charleston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.6% compared to 9.6% in Cedar falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Charleston at 8.1%, compared to 2.8% in Cedar falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cedar falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 19.3% in Charleston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.