Demographics details for Cedar bluff, VA vs Usk, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar bluff, VA vs Usk, WA.
Data | Cedar bluff | Usk |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,045 | 134 |
Median Age | 48.9 years | 46.0 years |
Median Income | $41,094 | $60,000 |
Married Families | 54.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Cedar bluff vs Usk
- In Cedar bluff, the population is higher at 1,045, compared to 134 in Usk.
- Residents in Cedar bluff have a higher median age of 48.9 years compared to 46.0 years in Usk.
- Usk has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $41,094 in Cedar bluff.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar bluff at 54.0% compared to 50.0% in Usk.
- The poverty level is higher in Usk at 12%, compared to 8% in Cedar bluff.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar bluff is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in Usk.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar bluff vs Usk provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cedar bluff | Usk |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 100 | 90 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar bluff vs Usk
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cedar bluff and Usk at 0%.
- Cedar bluff has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 90% in Usk.
- Both Cedar bluff and Usk have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Usk has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Cedar bluff.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Usk at 2%, compared to 0% in Cedar bluff.
- In Usk, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Cedar bluff.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cedar bluff | Usk |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 28.4% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 21.7% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 36.2% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar bluff vs Usk
- More residents in Cedar bluff report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar bluff at 28.4% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cedar bluff at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar bluff at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar bluff at 36.2% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cedar bluff at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cedar bluff | Usk |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 32.9% (344) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 19.7% (206) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (136) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar bluff vs Usk
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cedar bluff and Usk at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar bluff hold a high school diploma at 32.9% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- More residents in Cedar bluff have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar bluff hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Usk.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.