Demographics details for Cave creek, AZ vs Columbia, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cave creek, AZ vs Columbia, SC.
Data | Cave creek | Columbia |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,135 | 139,698 |
Median Age | 58.1 years | 28.3 years |
Median Income | $90,824 | $54,095 |
Married Families | 54.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Cave creek vs Columbia
- The population in Columbia is higher at 139,698, compared to 5,135 in Cave creek.
- Residents in Cave creek have a higher median age of 58.1 years compared to 28.3 years in Columbia.
- Cave creek has a higher median income of $90,824 compared to $54,095 in Columbia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cave creek at 54.0% compared to 25.0% in Columbia.
- The poverty level is higher in Columbia at 17%, compared to 8% in Cave creek.
- Columbia has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.2% in Cave creek.
Demographics
Demographics Cave creek vs Columbia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cave creek | Columbia |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 40 |
White | 88 | 48 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cave creek vs Columbia
- In Columbia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 2% in Cave creek.
- Cave creek has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 48% in Columbia.
- In Columbia, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Cave creek.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Cave creek and Columbia at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Columbia at 5%, compared to 4% in Cave creek.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cave creek and Columbia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cave creek | Columbia |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 13.1% |
Depression | 20.0% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 11.3% | 19.1% |
Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 18.1% |
Obesity | 27.7% | 39.0% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cave creek vs Columbia
- In Columbia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.5% in Cave creek.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Columbia at 20.8% versus 20.0% in Cave creek.
- Columbia has a higher smoking rate at 19.1% compared to 11.3% in Cave creek.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cave creek at 19.5% compared to 18.1% in Columbia.
- Columbia has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 27.7% in Cave creek.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cave creek at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Columbia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cave creek | Columbia |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (53) | 0.4% (555) |
High School Diploma | 11.5% (590) | 8.4% (11,712) |
Less than High School | 4.2% (218) | 5.9% (8,257) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 40.9% (2,102) | 24.7% (34,575) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cave creek vs Columbia
- A higher percentage of residents in Cave creek have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Columbia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cave creek hold a high school diploma at 11.5% compared to 8.4% in Columbia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Columbia at 5.9%, compared to 4.2% in Cave creek.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cave creek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.9% compared to 24.7% in Columbia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.