Demographics details for Catawba, SC vs Pratt, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Catawba, SC vs Pratt, KS.
| Data | Catawba | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,439 | 9,067 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $50,920 | $61,685 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Catawba vs Pratt
- The population in Pratt is higher at 9,067, compared to 1,439 in Catawba.
- The median age in Pratt is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 32.7 years in Catawba.
- Pratt has a higher median income of $61,685, compared to $50,920 in Catawba.
- In Pratt, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 33.0% in Catawba.
- The poverty level is identical in both Catawba and Pratt at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Catawba is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Pratt.
Demographics
Demographics Catawba vs Pratt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Catawba | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 2 |
| White | 63 | 83 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Catawba vs Pratt
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Catawba at 23% compared to 2% in Pratt.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pratt at 83% compared to 63% in Catawba.
- The Asian population is larger in Catawba at 4% compared to 0% in Pratt.
- Pratt has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 6% in Catawba.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pratt at 6%, compared to 4% in Catawba.
- In Pratt, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Catawba.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Catawba | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Catawba vs Pratt
- More residents in Catawba report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.4% in Pratt.
- Depression is more prevalent in Catawba at 22.2% compared to 19.7% in Pratt.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Catawba and Pratt at 17.0%.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pratt at 19.0% compared to 18.3% in Catawba.
- Pratt has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 34.8% in Catawba.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Catawba and Pratt at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Catawba | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 0.2% (22) |
| High School Diploma | 11.5% (166) | 15.0% (1,362) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (226) | 10.3% (936) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.5% (310) | 18.0% (1,634) |
Education Levels Comparison: Catawba vs Pratt
- In Pratt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.1% in Catawba.
- In Pratt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 11.5% in Catawba.
- More residents in Catawba have less than a high school education at 15.7% compared to 10.3% in Pratt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Catawba hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 18.0% in Pratt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.