Demographics details for Castle rock, CO vs Chicago, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Castle rock, CO vs Chicago, IL.
Data | Castle rock | Chicago |
---|---|---|
Population | 80,191 | 2,665,039 |
Median Age | 35.8 years | 35.3 years |
Median Income | $135,985 | $71,673 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 2% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Castle rock vs Chicago
- The population in Chicago is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 80,191 in Castle rock.
- Residents in Castle rock have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Castle rock has a higher median income of $135,985 compared to $71,673 in Chicago.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Castle rock at 44.0% compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- The poverty level is higher in Chicago at 18%, compared to 2% in Castle rock.
- Chicago has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 4.1% in Castle rock.
Demographics
Demographics Castle rock vs Chicago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Castle rock | Chicago |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 29 |
White | 81 | 23 |
Asian | 2 | 7 |
Hispanic | 10 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Castle rock vs Chicago
- In Chicago, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 1% in Castle rock.
- Castle rock has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- In Chicago, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Castle rock.
- Chicago has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 10% in Castle rock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chicago at 10%, compared to 6% in Castle rock.
- In Chicago, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Castle rock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Castle rock | Chicago |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 11.6% |
Depression | 19.6% | 16.3% |
Smoking | 10.4% | 15.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 24.3% | 34.1% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Castle rock vs Chicago
- In Chicago, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 13.3% in Castle rock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Castle rock at 19.6% compared to 16.3% in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher smoking rate at 15.1% compared to 10.4% in Castle rock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Castle rock at 18.9% compared to 16.5% in Chicago.
- Chicago has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 24.3% in Castle rock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chicago at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Castle rock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Castle rock | Chicago |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (142) | 1.7% (44,697) |
High School Diploma | 6.7% (5,389) | 13.3% (354,780) |
Less than High School | 2.8% (2,284) | 15.8% (419,784) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (25,532) | 30.4% (811,024) |
Education Levels Comparison: Castle rock vs Chicago
- In Chicago, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.2% in Castle rock.
- In Chicago, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.3% compared to 6.7% in Castle rock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chicago at 15.8%, compared to 2.8% in Castle rock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Castle rock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 30.4% in Chicago.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.