Demographics details for Cassatt, SC vs Maquoketa, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cassatt, SC vs Maquoketa, IA.
Data | Cassatt | Maquoketa |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,000 | 6,054 |
Median Age | 36.0 years | 40.8 years |
Median Income | $55,000 | $53,462 |
Married Families | 65.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Cassatt vs Maquoketa
- The population in Maquoketa is higher at 6,054, compared to 1,000 in Cassatt.
- The median age in Maquoketa is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 36.0 years in Cassatt.
- Cassatt has a higher median income of $55,000 compared to $53,462 in Maquoketa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cassatt at 65.0% compared to 38.0% in Maquoketa.
- Cassatt has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Maquoketa.
- The unemployment rate in Cassatt is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Maquoketa.
Demographics
Demographics Cassatt vs Maquoketa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cassatt | Maquoketa |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 2 |
White | 85 | 96 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cassatt vs Maquoketa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cassatt at 10% compared to 2% in Maquoketa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Maquoketa at 96% compared to 85% in Cassatt.
- The Asian population is larger in Cassatt at 2% compared to 0% in Maquoketa.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cassatt at 2% compared to 1% in Maquoketa.
- Both Cassatt and Maquoketa have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cassatt and Maquoketa at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cassatt | Maquoketa |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 11.8% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 20.5% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 22.0% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 20.7% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 39.8% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cassatt vs Maquoketa
- In Maquoketa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Maquoketa at 20.5% versus 0.0% in Cassatt.
- Maquoketa has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Maquoketa at 20.7% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- Maquoketa has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Maquoketa at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cassatt | Maquoketa |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (12) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 28.0% (1,696) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 5.3% (323) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 11.1% (673) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cassatt vs Maquoketa
- In Maquoketa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- In Maquoketa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.0% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Maquoketa at 5.3%, compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- In Maquoketa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.