Demographics details for Cassatt, SC vs Ecru, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cassatt, SC vs Ecru, MS.

Data Cassatt Ecru
Population 1,000 919
Median Age 36.0 years 24.8 years
Median Income $55,000 $52,350
Married Families 65.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 12% 16%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 5.0

Population Comparison: Cassatt vs Ecru

  • In Cassatt, the population is higher at 1,000, compared to 919 in Ecru.
  • Residents in Cassatt have a higher median age of 36.0 years compared to 24.8 years in Ecru.
  • Cassatt has a higher median income of $55,000 compared to $52,350 in Ecru.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cassatt at 65.0% compared to 49.0% in Ecru.
  • The poverty level is higher in Ecru at 16%, compared to 12% in Cassatt.
  • Ecru has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.0% in Cassatt.

Demographics

Demographics Cassatt vs Ecru provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cassatt Ecru
Black 10 44
White 85 25
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 23
Two or More Races 1 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cassatt vs Ecru

  • In Ecru, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 44% compared to 10% in Cassatt.
  • Cassatt has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 25% in Ecru.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cassatt at 2% compared to 0% in Ecru.
  • Ecru has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 2% in Cassatt.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ecru at 8%, compared to 1% in Cassatt.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cassatt and Ecru at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cassatt Ecru
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.2%
Depression Data is updating% 25.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 25.0%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.6%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.5%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cassatt vs Ecru

  • In Ecru, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Ecru at 25.1% versus 0.0% in Cassatt.
  • Ecru has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Ecru at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
  • Ecru has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ecru at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cassatt Ecru
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.2% (20)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 15.5% (142)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 31.1% (286)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 14.8% (136)

Education Levels Comparison: Cassatt vs Ecru

  • In Ecru, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
  • In Ecru, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ecru at 31.1%, compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
  • In Ecru, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.