Demographics details for Cashion, OK vs Woodbine, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cashion, OK vs Woodbine, MD.
| Data | Cashion | Woodbine |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 892 | 8,124 |
| Median Age | 33.3 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $96,705 | $115,000 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 65.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cashion vs Woodbine
- The population in Woodbine is higher at 8,124, compared to 892 in Cashion.
- The median age in Woodbine is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 33.3 years in Cashion.
- Woodbine has a higher median income of $115,000, compared to $96,705 in Cashion.
- In Woodbine, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 58.0% in Cashion.
- Cashion has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 4% in Woodbine.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Cashion and Woodbine at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Cashion vs Woodbine provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cashion | Woodbine |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 10 |
| White | 53 | 85 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 22 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 22 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cashion vs Woodbine
- In Woodbine, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 2% in Cashion.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodbine at 85% compared to 53% in Cashion.
- In Woodbine, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cashion.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cashion at 22% compared to 3% in Woodbine.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cashion at 22% compared to 0% in Woodbine.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cashion at 1% compared to 0% in Woodbine.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cashion | Woodbine |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.0% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cashion vs Woodbine
- More residents in Cashion report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Woodbine.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cashion at 24.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodbine.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cashion at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Woodbine.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cashion at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Woodbine.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cashion at 36.9% compared to 0.0% in Woodbine.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cashion at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodbine.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cashion | Woodbine |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 25.8% (230) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (46) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.4% (218) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cashion vs Woodbine
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cashion and Woodbine at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cashion hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 0.0% in Woodbine.
- More residents in Cashion have less than a high school education at 5.2% compared to 0.0% in Woodbine.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cashion hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 0.0% in Woodbine.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.