Demographics details for Cashion, OK vs Newark, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cashion, OK vs Newark, NJ.
| Data | Cashion | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 892 | 305,344 |
| Median Age | 33.3 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $96,705 | $46,460 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 7.8 |
Population Comparison: Cashion vs Newark
- The population in Newark is higher at 305,344, compared to 892 in Cashion.
- The median age in Newark is higher at 34.7 years, compared to 33.3 years in Cashion.
- Cashion has a higher median income of $96,705 compared to $46,460 in Newark.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cashion at 58.0% compared to 25.0% in Newark.
- The poverty level is higher in Newark at 30%, compared to 7% in Cashion.
- Newark has a higher unemployment rate at 7.8% compared to 3.5% in Cashion.
Demographics
Demographics Cashion vs Newark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cashion | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 47 |
| White | 53 | 3 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 22 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 22 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cashion vs Newark
- In Newark, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 47% compared to 2% in Cashion.
- Cashion has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 3% in Newark.
- In Newark, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cashion.
- Newark has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 22% in Cashion.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cashion at 22% compared to 11% in Newark.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cashion at 1% compared to 0% in Newark.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cashion | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cashion vs Newark
- In Newark, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.5% in Cashion.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cashion at 24.0% compared to 18.2% in Newark.
- Newark has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 15.4% in Cashion.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cashion at 15.9% compared to 13.9% in Newark.
- Newark has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 36.9% in Cashion.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Newark at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Cashion.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cashion | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.5% (7,516) |
| High School Diploma | 25.8% (230) | 21.9% (66,812) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (46) | 24.1% (73,461) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.4% (218) | 11.1% (33,938) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cashion vs Newark
- In Newark, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Cashion.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cashion hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 21.9% in Newark.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Newark at 24.1%, compared to 5.2% in Cashion.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cashion hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 11.1% in Newark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.